All parties who have made a substantive contribution to the article should be listed as authors. Principal authorship, authorship order, and other publication credits should be based on the relative scientific or professional contributions of the individuals involved, regardless of their status. A student is usually listed as principal author on any multiple-authored publication that substantially derives from the student’s research proposal.


Manuscripts will be reviewed by the editorial office if it is felt that the work was not carried out within an ethical issue.


In order to check the originality of the papers, all papers are submitted to to avoid or detect any plagiarism.

Open Access

Research Hub provide immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Copyright Notice

Copyright of articles that appear in the journal belongs exclusively to Adinda Resources (Publisher). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions or any other reproductions of similar nature.


Research Hub is published by Adinda Resources (Registration No: SA0230840-H). Adinda Resources is a publisher company in Selangor, Malaysia. The company embraces , innovative ideas, encourages research collaboration and training worldwide among student and researcher. Publisher aims to promote exchange of information and knowledge in research work, new inventions and developments in information management  towards the structuring of an information-rich society.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

Publication fee

There is no publication fee.

Peer review 
This journal operates a single blind review process. All contributions will be initially assessed by the editor for suitability for the journal. Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. The Editor is responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's decision is final.


  1. The sole responsibility for acceptance or rejection of a manuscript rests with the editor. 

  2. Editors should generally grant the request of an author who asks that particular individual(s) be excluded from the review of a particular manuscript. 

  3. Editors should establish a review process that minimizes bias. 

  4. Editors should subject all manuscripts of a given type to equivalent and unprejudiced reviews. Decisions about acceptance for publication should occur in a reasonable time frame, and (except for issues devoted to special topics) manuscripts should, to the editors best ability, be published in the chronological order of acceptance. 

  5. Editors should provide to the authors a written rationale for editorial decisions regarding a manuscript submitted for publication. This is especially important if the manuscript is being rejected.

  6. Unpublished manuscripts must be treated as confidential documents by all individuals involved in the editorial process.

  7. Editors should correct errors in a manuscript if the errors are detected or reported before publication, or publish corrections if they are detected afterward. 

  8. Editors should handle cases of alleged misconduct at the lowest possible organizational level, and should usually involve the institutions at which the research in question was performed. 

  9. Papers submitted by an editor or associate editor should be handled by another member of the editorial board.